WebAs such, you have two primary options. The first is simply to create a new ConcurrentQueue instead of clearing the original, and then swap in the new for the original. The second is to continually remove from the collection until it's empty, e.g. T ignored; while (cq.TryDequeue (out ignored));. WebMay 15, 2024 · In-Memory Cache is used for when you want to implement cache in a single process. When the process dies, the cache dies with it. ... Let’s create a very simple cache implementation in C#: ... this is a thread-safe implementation. You can safely call this from multiple threads at once. The second thing thing is the MemoryCache allows for all ...
Cache : A threadsafe, Simple, Efficient, Generic In …
WebMar 21, 2024 · MemoryDistributedCache is thread safe since using MemoryCache internally. github.com/dotnet/extensions/blob/master/src/Caching/Memory/src/… – user8810910 Mar 21, 2024 at 20:04 Thank you! But what about RedisCache? – AlexB Mar 21, 2024 at 20:17 RedisCache is not thread-safe. WebJun 16, 2024 · I implemented a thread safe pseudo LRU designed for concurrent workloads - currently in use in a production system. Performance is very close to ConcurrentDictionary, ~10x faster than MemoryCache and hit rate is better than a conventional LRU. Full analysis provided in the github link below. Usage looks like this: iown apple
Async threadsafe Get from MemoryCache in C# - iditect.com
WebNov 20, 2011 · This is not a bad idea, but it would seem that it doesn't address read performance issues. – JoeGeeky Nov 19, 2011 at 16:45 1 GetData would not be thread-safe if there is a thread manipulating the dictionary referenced by _cache. But there is no thread manipulating it, so it is thread-safe! – dtb Nov 19, 2011 at 16:48 WebJul 28, 2024 · the .NET Dictionary is thread-safe, as long as it is used only in read access, thus not requiring locks in reading methods. You are playing with fire here. Your statement is only true iff no thread will modify the dictionary. i own a small business how do i pay myself